Market Revolution & American Citizenship
How did the Market Revolution challenge the existing ideas about American citizenship during the antebellum period? - a discussion of wage labor and citizenship, shifting concepts of independence, and how such changes are connected to reform efforts during this period.
Before the Market Revolution
independence meant being a landowner (most likely white, always male). The
argument was that if you owned land, you had a stake in the nation’s future,
and so you were entitled to a vote. Those who did not own land (women, poor
white men, most blacks) were considered dependent, therefore did not get to
vote. The division was along class lines. By the time the Market Revolution was
in full swing, the dividing line had shifted from class to gender and race.
Poor white men
who had moved to the cities in search of wage labor in factories began to see
themselves as independent individuals. Living away from their families, they
were looking after themselves, paying their own way, and feeling just as
entitled to vote as any farmer who owned land. Working white men began to get
involved in the politics that was going on around them, and demanded their
right to participate in it. They started to equate their citizenship with the
right to vote, and claimed that ownership of land should not be a requirement
for voting rights – just ownership of yourself. This was the principle behind
Dorr’s War, which eventually resulted in the granting of voting rights to white
men whether they owned land or not.
![]() |
Dorr inciting a crowd of supporters |
These same
rights were not extended to non-whites or to women. Blacks were not considered
citizens at all, and enslaved blacks were not even considered men, but
property. Women had very few rights, and once married, had practically none –
their entire civic identities vanished under those of their husbands. As
democracy was expanding for poor white men, it was shrinking for women and
non-whites. Intellectual arguments began to be made, justifying the exclusion
of these groups based on “scientific” facts. White Anglo-Saxon men were just
naturally more intelligent than women and non-whites, and that was that.
![]() | |
"scientific proof" |
This new concept of
the right to vote being related to ownership of self was a reflection of
society’s new concept of the importance of the self. The Second Great Awakening
was reminding people of their importance in the eyes of God. People began
to feel that the self had a great power and significance, and that individuals
could change the world if they tried hard enough. Many still remembered,
firsthand, the American Revolution, and they knew that people had the power to
effect change. People began to question old rules and values. Radical utopias
sprang up all over the nation – communities of people who wanted to radically
change the rules of society.
Many focused on changing the accepted norms of gender, and property rights (e.g. the Shakers, pictured above) – both of which kept personal control out of the hands of non-whites and women. Other attempts to reform society included moral reform movements, institutional reform movements, and human rights movements, such as abolitionism and women’s rights.
Many focused on changing the accepted norms of gender, and property rights (e.g. the Shakers, pictured above) – both of which kept personal control out of the hands of non-whites and women. Other attempts to reform society included moral reform movements, institutional reform movements, and human rights movements, such as abolitionism and women’s rights.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjCflCrov3jIsFebZcdUal0ABHE6KYOcXHkt0iH-COO8kk8qVJ7Ix9JajlUiyAiNKIeoIaHZnja3Ln4j8Ge9356Vnf80cEyWhUSsGpY2p7yKIa1130asdkr_IDEwAZCCmVicMtff9rC40k/s320/balance-1.jpg)
![]() |
signed by Frederick Douglass |
No comments:
Post a Comment